LONGS

American Surname Summary Data for LONGS

Frequency Comparisons
Total Rank Frequency % Per million people
United States
United States (Current snapshot) 314 60083 0.000 1
United States (1880 census) 41 54863 0.000 1
Change since 1880 +273 -5220 0 0
Other Countries
Australia N/A N/A
United Kingdom N/A N/A

Top States for LONGS by Total
State Total Rank in State Frequency % Per million people
Ohio 53 29982 0.000 5
Texas 28 50070 0.000 1
Pennsylvania 26 64279 0.000 2
Michigan 23 61603 0.000 2
Louisiana 20 21302 0.000 4
Top States for LONGS by Frequency
State Total Rank in State Frequency % Per million people
Mississippi 17 12673 0.001 6
Ohio 53 29982 0.000 5
Louisiana 20 21302 0.000 4
Arkansas 11 20718 0.000 4
Michigan 23 61603 0.000 2

Notes
  • Total is the total number of people with that surname.
  • Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
  • Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
  • Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

'N/A' indicates that we don't have data for this name (usually because it's quite uncommon and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

For less common surnames, the frequency and "per million" values may be 0 even though there are people with that name. That's because they represent less than one in a million of the population, which ends up as 0 after rounding.

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the USA as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.

Figures for top states show firstly the states where most people called LONGS live. This obviously tends to be biased towards the most populous states. The second set of figures show where people called LONGS represent the biggest proportion of the population. So, in this case, there are more people called LONGS in Ohio than any other state, but you are more likely to find a LONGS by picking someone at random in Mississippi than anywhere else.

Similar Names

The following names have similar spellings or pronunciations as LONGS.

This does not necessarily imply a direct relationship between the names, but may indicate names that could be mistaken for this one when written down or misheard.

The most likely matches are shown first.

LONES
LONG
LONGO
LONGE
LONAS
LONGHI
LONGIE
LONS
LYONS
LANKA
LANNING
LANOIS
LANCEY
LANOSA
LANOSGA
LANGSHAW
LANK
LANSEY
LAWNICKI
LAWING
LAUNIUS
LANZO
LANZI
LANZE
LANZA
LANZ
LANUZA
LANSKI
LANGOWSKI
LANGO
LAMONICA
LAMKE
LAMING
LAMINACK
LAMICA
LAMENS
LAMAS
LAMANGO
LAMANCE
LAMONS
LANASA
LANGI
LANGE
LANG
LANESE
LANES
LANEAUX
LANCZ
LANCIA
LANCE

Matches are generated automatically by a combination of Soundex, Metaphone and Levenshtein matching.

Common Misspellings and Typos

The following words are slight variants of LONGS that are likely to be possible typos or misspellings in written material.

LOGNS LNOGS OLNGS LONG LONGA LONGSA LONGSE LONGSI LONGSO