The COST surname in the USA

Frequency Comparisons
	Total	Rank	Frequency %	Per million people
United States
United States (Current snapshot)	1,474	17582	0.001	6
United States (1880 census)	405	11386	0.001	8
Change since 1880	+1069	-6196	0	-2
Other Countries
Australia	12	77687	0	1
United Kingdom	37	26946	0	1

Top States for COST by Total
State	Total	Rank in State	Frequency %	Per million people
Ohio	232	5897	0.002	20
Alabama	152	3669	0.003	34
Pennsylvania	137	10710	0.001	11
California	113	20368	0.000	3
Texas	74	19116	0.000	4
Top States for COST by Frequency
State	Total	Rank in State	Frequency %	Per million people
Alabama	152	3669	0.003	34
Rhode Island	32	4778	0.003	31
Ohio	232	5897	0.002	20
West Virginia	35	4750	0.002	19
Maine	16	8591	0.001	13

Notes

Total is the total number of people with that surname.
Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

'A figure of zero indicates that we don't have data for this name (usually because it's quite uncommon and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

For less common surnames, the frequency and "per million" values may be 0 even though there are people with that name. That's because they represent less than one in a million of the population, which ends up as 0 after rounding.

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the USA as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.

Figures for top states show firstly the states where most people called COST live. This obviously tends to be biased towards the most populous states. The second set of figures show where people called COST represent the biggest proportion of the population. So, in this case, there are more people called COST in Ohio than any other state, but you are more likely to find a COST by picking someone at random in Alabama than anywhere else.

Classification and Origin of COST

Sorry, we don't have any origin and classification information for the COST surname.

Ethnic distribution of COST in the USA

Classification	Total	Percent
Black/African American	119	8.07
White (Hispanic)	19	1.29
Native American/Alaskan	7	0.47
White (Caucasian)	1,322	89.69
Asian/Pacific	Less than 100	Insignificant
Mixed Race	Less than 100	Insignificant

Ethnic distribution data shows the number and percentage of people with the COST surname who reported their ethnic background as being in these broad categories in the most recent national census.

COST is a genuine surname, but it's an uncommon one. Did you possibly mean one of these instead?

Similar names to COST

The following names have similar spellings or pronunciations as COST.

This does not necessarily imply a direct relationship between the names, but may indicate names that could be mistaken for this one when written down or misheard.