The LEIDING surname in the USA

Frequency Comparisons
	Total	Rank	Frequency %	Per million people
United States
United States (Current snapshot)	279	66274	0	1
United States (1880 census)	18	76667	0	0
Change since 1880	+261	+10393	+N/A	+N/A
Other Countries
Australia	2	246668	0	0
United Kingdom	0			0

Top States for LEIDING by Total
State	Total	Rank in State	Frequency %	Per million people
Minnesota	78	9390	0.002	16
Illinois	40	31117	0.000	3
Florida	26	51581	0.000	2
Colorado	21	22929	0.000	5
Nebraska	18	14043	0.001	11
Top States for LEIDING by Frequency
State	Total	Rank in State	Frequency %	Per million people
Minnesota	78	9390	0.002	16
Nebraska	18	14043	0.001	11
Colorado	21	22929	0.000	5
Iowa	13	26052	0.000	4
Illinois	40	31117	0.000	3

Notes

Total is the total number of people with that surname.
Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

'A figure of zero indicates that we don't have data for this name (usually because it's quite uncommon and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

For less common surnames, the frequency and "per million" values may be 0 even though there are people with that name. That's because they represent less than one in a million of the population, which ends up as 0 after rounding.

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the USA as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.

Figures for top states show firstly the states where most people called LEIDING live. This obviously tends to be biased towards the most populous states. The second set of figures show where people called LEIDING represent the biggest proportion of the population. So, in this case, there are more people called LEIDING in Minnesota than any other state, but you are more likely to find a LEIDING by picking someone at random in Minnesota than anywhere else.

Classification and Origin of LEIDING

Sorry, we don't have any origin and classification information for the LEIDING surname.

Ethnic distribution of LEIDING in the USA

Classification	Total	Percent
White (Caucasian)	270	96.77
Mixed Race	6	2.15
Asian/Pacific	Less than 100	Insignificant
Black/African American	None reported	0
Native American/Alaskan	None reported	0
White (Hispanic)	Less than 100	Insignificant

Ethnic distribution data shows the number and percentage of people with the LEIDING surname who reported their ethnic background as being in these broad categories in the most recent national census.

LEIDING is a genuine surname, but it's an uncommon one. Did you possibly mean one of these instead?

Similar names to LEIDING

The following names have similar spellings or pronunciations as LEIDING.

This does not necessarily imply a direct relationship between the names, but may indicate names that could be mistaken for this one when written down or misheard.