The LITTS surname in the USA

Frequency Comparisons
	Total	Rank	Frequency %	Per million people
United States
United States (Current snapshot)	751	29598	0	3
United States (1880 census)	283	14915	0.001	6
Change since 1880	+468	-14683	+N/A	-3
Other Countries
Australia	0			0
United Kingdom	0			0

Top States for LITTS by Total
State	Total	Rank in State	Frequency %	Per million people
New York	149	12845	0.001	8
Pennsylvania	91	16004	0.001	7
Florida	70	23342	0.000	4
Washington	50	14157	0.001	8
Michigan	49	25536	0.000	5
Top States for LITTS by Frequency
State	Total	Rank in State	Frequency %	Per million people
New Mexico	30	5232	0.002	16
Washington	50	14157	0.001	8
New York	149	12845	0.001	8
Pennsylvania	91	16004	0.001	7
Oregon	19	21833	0.001	6

Notes

Total is the total number of people with that surname.
Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

'A figure of zero indicates that we don't have data for this name (usually because it's quite uncommon and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

For less common surnames, the frequency and "per million" values may be 0 even though there are people with that name. That's because they represent less than one in a million of the population, which ends up as 0 after rounding.

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the USA as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.

Figures for top states show firstly the states where most people called LITTS live. This obviously tends to be biased towards the most populous states. The second set of figures show where people called LITTS represent the biggest proportion of the population. So, in this case, there are more people called LITTS in New York than any other state, but you are more likely to find a LITTS by picking someone at random in New Mexico than anywhere else.

Classification and Origin of LITTS

Sorry, we don't have any origin and classification information for the LITTS surname.

Ethnic distribution of LITTS in the USA

Classification	Total	Percent
White (Caucasian)	743	98.93
Asian/Pacific	Less than 100	0
Black/African American	Less than 100	Insignificant
Mixed Race	Less than 100	Insignificant
Native American/Alaskan	Less than 100	Insignificant
White (Hispanic)	Less than 100	Insignificant

Ethnic distribution data shows the number and percentage of people with the LITTS surname who reported their ethnic background as being in these broad categories in the most recent national census.

LITTS is a genuine surname, but it's an uncommon one. Did you possibly mean one of these instead?

Similar names to LITTS

The following names have similar spellings or pronunciations as LITTS.

This does not necessarily imply a direct relationship between the names, but may indicate names that could be mistaken for this one when written down or misheard.