The history of your name

The SANGES surname in the USA

Frequency Comparisons
Total Rank Frequency % Per million people
United States
United States (Current snapshot) 135 118954 0.000 0
United States (1880 census) 27 66285 0.000 1
Change since 1880 +108 -52669 0 N/A
Other Countries
Australia 3 200973 0.000 0
United Kingdom 0 0
Top States for SANGES by Total
State Total Rank in State Frequency % Per million people
New York 31 57245 0.000 2
Georgia 20 23092 0.000 2
California 19 104540 0.000 1
New Jersey 13 75351 0.000 2
Illinois 11 104885 0.000 1
Top States for SANGES by Frequency
State Total Rank in State Frequency % Per million people
Georgia 20 23092 0.000 2
New York 31 57245 0.000 2
New Jersey 13 75351 0.000 2
Arkansas 4 39925 0.000 1
North Carolina 11 39211 0.000 1

Notes

'A figure of zero indicates that we don't have data for this name (usually because it's quite uncommon and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

For less common surnames, the frequency and "per million" values may be 0 even though there are people with that name. That's because they represent less than one in a million of the population, which ends up as 0 after rounding.

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the USA as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.

Figures for top states show firstly the states where most people called SANGES live. This obviously tends to be biased towards the most populous states. The second set of figures show where people called SANGES represent the biggest proportion of the population. So, in this case, there are more people called SANGES in New York than any other state, but you are more likely to find a SANGES by picking someone at random in Georgia than anywhere else.

Classification and Origin of SANGES

Sorry, we don't have any origin and classification information for the SANGES surname.

Ethnic distribution of SANGES in the USA

Classification Total Percent
White (Caucasian) 116 85.93
Mixed Race 9 6.67
White (Hispanic) 9 6.67
Asian/Pacific Less than 100 Insignificant
Black/African American Less than 100 Insignificant
Native American/Alaskan None reported 0

Ethnic distribution data shows the number and percentage of people with the SANGES surname who reported their ethnic background as being in these broad categories in the most recent national census.

SANGES is a genuine surname, but it's an uncommon one. Did you possibly mean one of these instead?

Meaning of SANGES in historical publications

Sorry, we don't have any information on the meaning of SANGES.

Similar names to SANGES

The following names have similar spellings or pronunciations as SANGES.

This does not necessarily imply a direct relationship between the names, but may indicate names that could be mistaken for this one when written down or misheard.

Matches are generated automatically by a combination of Soundex, Metaphone and Levenshtein matching.

Potential typos for SANGES

The following words are slight variants of SANGES that are likely to be possible typos or misspellings in written material.